Tuesday, 19 May Globalization is not global westernization according to Amartya Sen in his article “How to judge globalism”. There is no time. Amartya Sen. “How to Judge Globalism”. Many critics see globalization as a western curse. But in fact it is not one way (west to east) nor is it necessarily a curse. In the article “How to Judge Globalism,” Amartya Sen provides a history of globalism. She talks how globalization is a two way street where in.
|Published (Last):||11 April 2006|
|PDF File Size:||15.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.93 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Globalization A Brief Review.
Sen on globalization
That is, he agrees with them that something must be done. A amargya movement occurred in the Eastern influence on Western mathematics. So resistance to the globalization of ideas, science and knowledge, on the basis that it is westernization, is not only short-sighted, it is stupid! But this is by no means uniformly so, even though there are cases in which this has happened. There is extensive evidence that the global economy has brought prosperity to many different areas of the globe.
Hello! Welcome to the Resource Centre.
Fair Sharing of Global Opportunities To conclude, the confounding of globalization with Westernization is not only ahistorical, it also distracts attention from the many potential benefits of global integration. It prevailed since centuries. How to Judge Globalism”— Presentation transcript: Sociology is… A social science The hkw study of human society and social behavior. These global interrelations have often been very productive in the advancement of different countries. The central issue of contention is not globalization itself, nor is it the use of the market as an institution, but the inequity in the overall balance of institutional arrangements–which produces very unequal sharing of the benefits of globalization.
You are commenting using your WordPress. If the central globallism of this question is accepted, then the whole debate turns on determining which side is correct in this empirical dispute. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Both sides, yo, accepted too readily the foundational dichotomy between two disparate civilizations. It globwlism not only the case that a marketinclusive system can generate very amartja results depending on various enabling conditions such as how physical resources are distributed, how human resources are developed, what rules of business relations prevail, what social-security arrangements are in place, and so on.
The crucial role of the markets does not make the other institutions insignificant, even in terms of the results that the market economy can produce. The real solution is to ensure that the distribution of benefits is fair, that the underdogs are getting adequate returns. As George Soros has pointed out, international business concerns often have a strong preference for working in orderly and highly organized autocracies rather than in activist and less-regimented democracies, and this can be a regressive influence on equitable development.
The technology was Chinese.
Ch. 2: How to Judge Globalism
Indeed, the world leaders who express deep frustration at the “irresponsibility” of antiglobalization protesters lead the countries that make the most money in this terrible trade.
It is easy to forget that the West was mired in poverty until the Industrial Revolution globaalism the 18th century.
But it would be a great mistake to see globalization primarily as a feature of imperialism. But the content came from elsewhere. Everyone is better off.
Global Interdependences and Movements The misdiagnosis that globalization of ideas and practices has to be resisted because it entails dreaded Westernization has played quite a regressive part in the colonial and postcolonial world. The real issue concerns how glpbalism benefits associated with these respective arrangements are distributed. Home Magazine Blogs Tapped: There is also a need for more clarity in formulating the distributional questions.
How to Judge Globalism | Business & Human Rights Resource Centre
It was printed four centuries later, in a. However, in the face of such appalling poverty and staggering inequalities, can we say that there is a fair distribution of the benefits of globalization?
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: